ACCELQ Vs Cypress. Why should you make the shift to ACCELQ?
A test automation platform helps teams automate their software testing needs, bringing down human intervention for greater speed, and efficiency in testing.
ACCELQ and Cypress are both platforms that aid in automated testing, and both present their unique features and advantages. But how do ACCELQ vs. Cypress testing compare? What are the features and product capabilities they offer? Let us get started.
What is Cypress?
Cypress is a JavaScript-based end-to-end testing tool designed for modern web test automation. This tool operates directly in the browser using a DOM manipulation technique and helps front-end developers and QA engineers draft automated web tests easily.
Cypress is an open-source automation testing framework based on JavaScript that supports web and API application testing. It executes tests on a real browser instance, eliminating the need to download browser drivers, a common challenge with Selenium test automation. The Cypress testing framework only supports the JavaScript language and hence is more suited for testing modern web applications built using popular frameworks like React, Angular, etc.
Do more with Test Automation
Discover more ways to add ‘low-code no-code‘ test automation in your workflows
Why does Cypress testing remain popular? Here's why:
- It is easy to set up and install, has no dependencies and does not require any additional downloads or changes to existing code.
- It is relatively easy for testing teams to quickly write and execute tests in real time as they build web applications.
- The tool helps teams design a suite of modern CI tests, record results, and gain powerful insights via advanced dashboards and reports.
- Since Cypress runs tests locally, teams can debug their tests while making the most of parallelization and load-balancing capabilities.
- Testers can also record their test results, screenshot them, and share aggregated insights with their peers.
Is that all?
Drawbacks of Cypress
Cypress cannot be used for test automation if requirements include support for non-Chromium browsers like Safari or Internet Explorer. It also cannot be used in testing multiple tabs or windows, comprehensive mobile browser testing, or interacting with the Shadow DOM extensively.
If the application involves complex network interactions requiring extensive network request mocking beyond the application’s domain, or running tests in parallel natively without additional configurations, Cypress might not be ideal. Since Cypress sticks to JavaScript applications the potential slowdown with large test suites further restricts its applicability for many testing scenarios today.
ACCELQ Vs Cypress Testing
| ACCELQ | CYPRESS |
|---|---|
| ACCELQ is full-blown enterprise-level test automation platform | Needs to be built from scratch and Lifetime maintenance burden. |
| Powerful natural language editor allows you to write test automation logic in plain English. Ensures design-first approach with inbuilt modularity and reusability | Requires mainstream programming language primarily JavaScript and Typescript. |
| Referential integrity across test assets. Embedded asset collaboration and management for Smart Test Plans & Governance | Effort-intensive manual process. Long term success solely depends on the maturity of the team. |
| Powerful & intelligent element capture technology creates robust automation. AI- powered Self-healing capabilities. | Uses Cypress Selector Playground to identify DOM elements based on name, class etc. or by element text. Requires technical knowledge to deal with complex and dynamic elements. |
| Dynamic live results views with actionable reports to trigger reruns | Basic reporting dashboard. Requires custom library integrations to creative rich html reports. |
| No coding needed, no matter how complex and dynamic the application. Enable the entire team to automate without the need for programming. | IDE or Editor needs to be installed to write code like Visual Studio Code. Knowledge of JavaScript and Typescript needed. |
| Test development exponentially accelerates when scaling up automation and maintenance significantly reduces when scaling up automation. | Test Script development becomes complex and slow when scaling up automation and maintenance significantly increases when scaling up automation. |
| Seamless extendible approach for Web- Mobile-API in one codeless flow. | Limited unified automation capabilities. API and mobile testing require hard core programming skills. Cypress will never be able to run on a native mobile app. |
| Powerful Test Management Platform with end-to-end capabilities | No Test Management capabilities |
| Test Assets are end-to-end aligned with platform vendor Releases. Live updates on new Releases by vendors. | Support is static in nature. Requires code and object locator updates to support anything new. |
| SaaS based multi-user collaborative platform on cloud with In-built version control | Not a collaborative multi-user environment. Requires connecting with GitHub for version control. |
| Shift-Left Performance and Accessibility testing | Not Available out of box can be extended using plugins but would need programming expertise. |
Why is ACCELQ the ideal test automation platform?
Considering ACCELQ Vs Cypress testing, the one platform that can keep up with innovation and a dynamic enterprise technology market is a codeless AI enterprise test automation platform like ACCELQ. ACCELQ further helps test Web, Mobile, API, Desktop, and Packaged Apps seamlessly in a unified flow. Powered by AI and no code, it enables data permutations and accurate coverage based on business semantics.
- Is easy to understand, set up, and use and allows teams to capture UI elements seamlessly.
- Eliminates framework overheads while offering unmatched features for automating testing across web, mobile, API, desktop, and mainframes.
- Automated test generation of complex web test design, maximising coverage and minimising tester stress and frustration.
- Leverages embedded frameworks, thus bringing modularity for faster development and lower maintenance.
- Demands very little from the testers who can easily automate test cases, lessening the burden on them and enabling quick in-sprint automation and code reusability.
- Allows testers to develop a range of different test scenarios based on predictive analytics and path analysis.
- Supports different browsers and OSes, allowing teams to kickstart and complete projects in no time.
- Offers a robust application blueprint and a strong visual test design, allowing testers to keep their focus on business needs.
Conclusion
The ideal test automation platform begins with empowering testers with simple and efficient ways to develop robust and flexible test suites. While Cypress remained popular for a few years it does lack modern-day automated testing capabilities. ACCELQ offers an AI-powered no-code test automation platform that is intuitive, and highly extensible. For more on getting started with your test automation journey, do reach out to us.
Geosley Andrades
Director, Product Evangelist at ACCELQ
Geosley is a Test Automation Evangelist and Community builder at ACCELQ. Being passionate about continuous learning, Geosley helps ACCELQ with innovative solutions to transform test automation to be simpler, more reliable, and sustainable for the real world.
Discover More
What Is Cucumber Framework? A Comprehensive Guide
What Is Cucumber Framework? A Comprehensive Guide
Why Agile Test Automation Approach
