Why choose a true No-Code platform like
ACCELQ, and not Worksoft!
One Platform that seamlessly
connects to all your testing needs
GLOBAL ENTERPRISE CUSTOMERS USE ACCELQ
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Cloud based modern platform | IDE based 1st Gen tool |
| User experience focused design, simple to use | Old school complex and clunky interface |
| Intuitive and Natural UI flow enables Fast Adoption (~1-3 weeks) | UI not very intuitive and involves a lot of clicks to edit or modify |
| Design first approach with Business process Application modelling | Relies more on action recording with makes it difficult to improvise on coverage |
| Test development exponentially accelerates when scaling up automation | Script development becomes complex and slow when scaling up automation |
| Maintenance significantly reduces when scaling up automation | Maintenance and Script duplicity significantly increases when scaling up automation |
| Seamless extendible approach for Web-Mobile-API in one codeless flow | Engine based disintegrated step based approach with no reusability |
| Embedded asset collaboration and management for Smart Test Plans & Governance | Disconnected Repository with no transparency of test asset management and planning |
| One native platform built with no Silos | Separate tools for recording , analysis and run |
Why ACCELQ is a better alternative to Worksoft?
In-sprint Automation & Shift-left
|
|
|---|---|
| Application functional abstraction | Not available |
| Design & author tests parallel to Application development enabling true shift-left | Not available |
| AI based Re-conciliation of abstraction | Not available |
| API, DB and middleware Automation with UI | Available with complex engine module, not seamless |
Test Design
|
|
|---|---|
| Universe based visual Application modelling | Not available |
| Test scenarios are modularized into Pages and User Actions | Record and Capture of Actions in one flow. Grouped by Page name. Lacks business logic grouping. |
| Page objects are naturally & automatically centralized across test scenarios | Objects are duplicated across libraries that may or may not get re-used |
| Design is enforced with intuitive and automatic universe concept | Design is not unified seamlessly. One needs to first record the actions and then customize. Design and Automation script generation are decoupled and have to be done asynchronously. |
| Data-driven scenarios and Test Case data is inherent to scenario design | Data-driven is a disconnected step once test case is automated and adds overhead. |
| Parameterization with design alignment to input, environment, run-time, linking and more | Technically oriented variable concept defined after the test case is defined, which reduces modularity |
Automation Development
|
|
|---|---|
| Codeless natural English coupled with recording | Test Steps generated based on recorded action. May lead to duplicity of action being recorded. |
| Logic editor provides readymade conditional rule validations, loops etc.… for real life tests. | Complex way to edit objects, actions and IDE is based on a tabular editor requiring a number of clicks. |
| Logic editor provides seamless transition from UI to Mobile to DB to API to File etc. | Modules transitions need to be recorded in one flow. Some of the logic is disintegrated. |
| AI based robust object handling and self-healing (works seamlessly with Angular, iframes, Shadow DOMs, charts, SVG, canvas etc.) | Traditional object interaction with limitations to handle complexity and newer tech stacks |
| Behavior driven predictive test designer for fast test creation and reusability | Each test case has to be recorded from scratch. The concept of removing duplicates only comes after recording. |
| Automated and AI based reconciliation for UI and Object changes | No centralized handling, No reconciliation |
| AI driven data permutations auto-generates test cases providing accurate coverage | Not available |
| Capture the structure of test data based on business semantics. Ensure data abstraction is consistently driven across test scenarios. | Is an additional step and is not seamless |
| Seamlessly manage multiple variants of test data suitable for different test execution environments | Not available |
| Cloud driven automatic extendibility to newer tech stacks (UI controls, DB, Mainframes, Files etc.) | Manual process to create and add engines. Requires specialized skills |
Automation Execution
|
|
|---|---|
| Cloud and Local Execution agents allow just-in-time execution against any tech stack | Cloud agent not natively supported |
| Cross OS, Cross browser, Cross Mobile execution natively packaged with same agent | Limited support with script setup approach |
| Inbuilt parallel execution with robust high performance agent that’s scalability | No parallel execution for web/UI on one agent |
| Secured and Encrypted communication between Agent and Cloud to test inside firewalls without any special VPN's or network restrictions | Not available |
| Docker support for Agent farm expansion with dynamic scalability and parallelization | Not supported |
| Integration with 3P cloud infrastructure farms like sauce labs, browser stacks | Limited Support integration to cloud farms like experitest and Perfecto |
Change Management
|
|
|---|---|
| Naturalized model with referential integrity across pages, test steps, objects, suites automates the change impact process efficiently propagating changes across test assets | No referential integrity possible between test assets |
| Objects are centrally managed in correlation with Application pages, and object changes are automatically reflected across all tests | Objects are managed in library manner that do not relate back to common shared model |
| Collaborative platform on cloud with real time sharing, version control, branching with intuitive design not requiring any special training or "source control" management skills | Offline repository for black-box script database. No real time asset sharing, no audit history tracking, no live version compares, no branching |
CI/CD & Tool Integrations
|
|
|---|---|
| Bi-directional and natively built synchronizer for Traceability tracking, coverage analysis and requirements based Test suite planning on a modern Web Interface on cloud | No clear visibility on overall test coverage |
| Two-way Defect creation, synchronization, and status tracking for full suite management | Lacks full blown suite management |
| CI job execution with pre-set configurations automatically execute test suites. Adapters support Jenkins, Team city, Bamboo, AzureDevOps, AutoRabit, Copado, Command line API etc. | Not a seamless technical integration |
| Workflow orchestration with CI workflows | Complex workflow orchestration needing tech expertise |
Technology Extendibility
|
|
|---|---|
| Open concept of user extensibility to expand scope of existing technology stack, as well as build-import to extend for new technology stack | Engine based concept requiring very specialized skill set |
| Cloud based community expansion is significantly rapid | Offline concept duplicates effort and high overhead and dependency of support |
| No impact from upgrades | Needs migrations and upgrades |
Governance & Reporting
|
|
|---|---|
| ACCELQ's app universe and analytic based algorithms drive automated Test Planning ensuring coverage | No intelligence in test planning and suite creation. Relies on the test recorder clubbing actions based on page name. An additional overhead to remove duplicate Test steps previously covered. |
| Dynamic live results views with actionable reports to trigger reruns | Live Transactions status results only. In-depth action results viewable only at the end of the run. |
| Embedded screen captures, directly associated with automation interactions | Screenshot’s report is separate from Test run report. Error snapshots not captured on run failure which would make it difficult to debug. |
| Umbrella style re-run capability for suite re-executions and roll up tracking | Not available |
The ACCELQ difference
Simple to adopt and elegantly designed, with the power to give your testing real acceleration
API and UI automated in the same flow
Unique capability to integrate API and UI testing in the same flow, enabling true end-to-end validation without handoffs. API testing at the same simplicity and regression maturity as UI automation.
Automated test case generation and data planning
Design your data behavior on a canvas and let ACCELQ take care of automated test case generation with proven risk coverage assurance. Centrally manage data changes without impacting test cases.
Seamless CI/CD integration and natural traceability
Native integration with CI/CD tools such as Jira, Jenkins ensure test automation is integral to development lifecycle. Traceability is redefined with the intelligent, connected test repository.
Salesforce Release
Alignment
Being an ISV partner, ACCELQ is aligned to Salesforce releases to ensure smooth Salesforce upgrades with robust Automation testing
Automation Support
Automation support for diverse technology stack for end-to-end Salesforce process validations
In-sprint automation without need for programming
Develop automation test logic in plain English, concurrently with application development. Address in-sprint volatility with intelligent change management and powerful reconciliation engine.
Enable manual testers to automate testing
Powerful natural language editor allows you to write test automation logic in plain English. Design-first approach on UX driven platform allows manual testers to scale up without learning curve.
Visual application model for lifecycle automation
ACCELQ’s Universe is a visual blueprint of your application and drives automation across quality lifecycle with business process focus. Develop test scenarios with predictive analytics.
Self-healing autonomic test automation
ACCELQ’s analytic runtime engine ensures a reliable test execution by intelligently adapting to unexpected application changes. Design-first approach ensure Robust element ID based on AI.
Recommended by Industry Experts
