Skip to main content
Logo
    Generic selectors
    Exact matches only
    Search in title
    Search in content
    Post Type Selectors

Top 10 QA Metrics Stakeholders Must Track in 2025

QA Metrics

18 Mar 2025

Read Time: 2 mins

QA metrics are measurable indicators that help assess software quality and testing efficiency. They track progress, evaluate test results, and improve the Software Development Life Cycle by monitoring QA activities and measuring team performance.

These metrics support productivity, decision-making, and cost estimation while ensuring software quality. Metrics like defect density and code coverage optimize testing efforts and enhance team collaboration. Understanding QA metrics requires exploring the modern QA process.

In software development, QA metrics software testing is essential to detect and rectify defects immediately. Contemporary QA methodologies are progressing through automation, AI-enhanced testing, and ongoing testing in DevOps processes. Shift-right and shift-left testing methods assist in identifying defects sooner and offer real-time oversight. Testing in the cloud enhances scalability, whereas exploratory and risk-oriented testing increases efficiency. Effective teamwork among QA, development, and operations teams guarantees quicker delivery of high-quality software with reduced defects

Key QA Metrics

Here are essential quality metrics and their significance.

1. Defect Density

Defect density measures several errors in a software module during development or testing, divided by the software’s size. It helps determine whether the software is ready for release.

This is usually measured per thousand lines of code (KLOC). It helps companies assess their software’s performance and find areas for improvement in their development process.

2. Test Automation Coverage

It measures how much of a software application has been tested. It helps check whether the test cases cover the code or features. Some common test coverage metrics include:

  • Test cases linked to requirements
  • Number of defects per requirement
  • Total number of requirements tested

3. Mean Time to Detect

MTTD tracks how long it takes to find defects after they appear. Faster detection allows for quicker fixes and reduces the impact on the development process. A low value means the testing process works well to catch defects early.

4. Mean Time to Resolve

MTTR assesses the speed at which defects are rectified once they are recognized. It demonstrates the effectiveness with which development and testing teams address problems. A decreased MTTR lessens system downtime and enhances software stability, rendering it a crucial metric for ensuring dependable software.

5. Test Execution Pass Rate

This QA metric shows the percentage of test cases that pass successfully during a testing cycle. It is calculated by dividing the number of passed test cases by the total test cases executed. This metric helps measure software quality by comparing successful tests to the total tests run.

6. Cost of Not Testing

This metric highlights the risks and financial impact of inadequate testing. It includes costs from post-release defects, customer complaints, and damage to brand reputation. Tracking this metric helps justify the need for strong testing strategies.

7. Customer-Reported Defects

This tracks defects reported by end users after the software is released. A lower number means better testing before release, while a high number indicates gaps in testing. This metric helps teams refine testing processes and focus on quality improvements.

8. Defects per Software Change

This measures defects introduced with each software update. A high number of defects per change suggests that regression testing needs improvement, while a lower number indicates stable development and effective testing.

9. Test Completion Status

This metric ensures that testing is finished on time. It helps teams track progress, identify delays, and ensure timely software releases. Consistently meeting test deadlines indicates an efficient testing process.

10. Test Reliability

Test Reliability checks if test results are consistent and accurate. If test results vary for the same conditions, it may indicate instability in the testing process. High test reliability means well-defined test cases that consistently detect defects.

Challenges & Solutions

One common challenge in software testing is data inconsistency. Differences in test data can cause incorrect results. This makes it hard to track issues and confirm fixes. Another challenge is resistance to change. Teams may find it difficult to adapt to new tools or processes, which slows down test automation.

A solution to data inconsistency is using automation with ACCELQ. It is the only cloud-based continuous testing platform that automates API and web testing without coding. It integrates automation with manual testing under one system. This helps Agile teams manage the QA process. It keeps test execution stable by handling test data dynamically. It further helps them track QA metrics in Agile. It is important to note that automated real-time tracking improves accuracy and reduces errors.

Organizations should focus on smooth integration of ACCELQ with current workflows to overcome resistance to change. Hands-on training, clear documentation, and quick success examples can help teams adapt. With ACCELQ’s codeless automation, teams can easily create and manage test scenarios. This makes the transition easier and improves test coverage.

Conclusion

Tracking the right QA automation metrics helps teams improve software quality. It reduces defects and makes testing more organized. In 2025, AI-driven automation tools like ACCELQ take this further. They optimize QA strategies with intelligent test execution, faster issue detection, and continuous testing.

These advancements help teams simplify testing and reduce manual work. They also speed up releases while maintaining high standards. Organizations can improve accuracy and reliability in QA processes by using AI-powered tools and focusing on meaningful metrics. This helps deliver strong software solutions that meet changing user expectations.

Geosley Andrades

Director, Product Evangelist at ACCELQ

Geosley is a Test Automation Evangelist and Community builder at ACCELQ. Being passionate about continuous learning, Geosley helps ACCELQ with innovative solutions to transform test automation to be simpler, more reliable, and sustainable for the real world.

You Might Also Like:

AI in Test AutomationBlogTest AutomationAI In Software Test Automation: The Future Is Here
12 February 2024

AI In Software Test Automation: The Future Is Here

Explore how AI Automated Testing is reshaping software quality assurance. AI in test automation, its impact, and future trends in this insightful blog.
The goal is to learn fast in test automation-ACCELQBlogTest AutomationThe goal isn’t to fail fast it’s to learn quickly in Test Automation.
15 November 2022

The goal isn’t to fail fast it’s to learn quickly in Test Automation.

The goal isn't to fail fast. It's to learn quickly. We should celebrate the lessons from failure, not failure itself.
OCR Test AutomationBlogTest AutomationOCR Test Automation: Enhancing Accuracy and Efficiency
11 September 2024

OCR Test Automation: Enhancing Accuracy and Efficiency

OCR test automation extracts and validates text from non-editable sources like images, PDFs, and scanned documents. Want to know in detail?

Get started on your Codeless Test Automation journey

Talk to ACCELQ Team and see how you can get started.